<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brandtdefense.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandtdefense.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com</link>
	<description>Website Description</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Nicole Nichols gets DWI Dismissed after Win on Motion to Suppress</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/nicole-nichols-wins-motion-to-suppress-evidence-in-hennepin-county-clients-dwi-is-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/nicole-nichols-wins-motion-to-suppress-evidence-in-hennepin-county-clients-dwi-is-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nnichols@brandtdefense.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Case & Client Victories | Brandt Criminal Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3rd deg dui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3rd deg dwi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3rd deg refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dui hennepin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dui hennepin county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dui minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwi hennepin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwi minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hennepin county dwi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to suppress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable expectation of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable expectation of privacy in garage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third degree dui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third degree dwi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third degree refusal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicole’s client was charged with Third Degree DWI – Refusal in Hennepin County.  After a careful review of the evidence, Nicole filed a motion to suppress all of the evidence relating to the DWI arrest because the police officer obtained the evidence after unlawfully entering her client’s garage.  At the contested hearing, Nicole cross-examined the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole’s client was charged with Third Degree DWI – Refusal in Hennepin County.  After a careful review of the evidence, Nicole filed a motion to suppress all of the evidence relating to the DWI arrest because the police officer obtained the evidence after unlawfully entering her client’s garage.  At the contested hearing, Nicole cross-examined the officer and argued that the officer violated her client’s Constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment when he went into her garage to follow up on a speeding ticket.  The judge agreed with Nicole, granted her motion, and suppressed all evidence of the DWI.  The DWI was subsequently dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/nicole-nichols-wins-motion-to-suppress-evidence-in-hennepin-county-clients-dwi-is-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Brandt Secures Continuance for Dismissal on a Trespass Charge in Hennepin County</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-secures-continuance-for-dismissal-on-a-trespass-charge-in-hennepin-county/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-secures-continuance-for-dismissal-on-a-trespass-charge-in-hennepin-county/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nnichols@brandtdefense.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Case & Client Victories | Brandt Criminal Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuance dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuance for dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continued for dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trespass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trespass construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trespass dismiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike’s client was accused of Trespass for wandering into a construction site late one night after out partying with his friends.  The Trespass conviction could have created many problems for the client in his future, as someone would not be aware of what the circumstances were for his arrest.  The prosecutor would not deal and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike’s client was accused of Trespass for wandering into a construction site late one night after out partying with his friends.  The Trespass conviction could have created many problems for the client in his future, as someone would not be aware of what the circumstances were for his arrest.  The prosecutor would not deal and wanted a plea of guilty; Mike presented the prosecutor with many equitable reasons why there should not be a conviction on the client’s record, pushed the prosecutor that he would take the case to trial, and the prosecutor eventually relented and agreed to continue the matter for dismissal.  What that means is that the charge against Mike’s client will be dismissed as long as he does not have a similar offense within one year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-secures-continuance-for-dismissal-on-a-trespass-charge-in-hennepin-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicole Nichols Gets Probation Violation Dismissed in Ramsey County</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/nicole-nichols-gets-probation-violation-dismissed-in-ramsey-county/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/nicole-nichols-gets-probation-violation-dismissed-in-ramsey-county/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nnichols@brandtdefense.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Case & Client Victories | Brandt Criminal Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probation violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probation violation dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramsey county probation violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicole’s client was facing up to 60 days in jail for violating probation on a case of Failing to Stop for an Accident Resulting in Bodily Injury or Death to Another where he was placed on probation for one year.  By failing to follow the terms of his probation, a warrant was issued for his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole’s client was facing up to 60 days in jail for violating probation on a case of Failing to Stop for an Accident Resulting in Bodily Injury or Death to Another where he was placed on probation for one year.  By failing to follow the terms of his probation, a warrant was issued for his arrest.  Nicole worked to convince the Probation Officer to dismiss the violation after her client went through treatment.  The violation was dismissed, the Court cancelled the probation violation hearing, and Nicole’s client was discharged from probation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/nicole-nichols-gets-probation-violation-dismissed-in-ramsey-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Brandt Succeeds in Getting Assault Charges Continued for Dismissal</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-succeeds-in-getting-assault-charges-continued-for-dismissal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-succeeds-in-getting-assault-charges-continued-for-dismissal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nnichols@brandtdefense.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Case & Client Victories | Brandt Criminal Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuance for dismissal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Brandt’s client was charged with Assault stemming from a road rage incident.  The other party involved was beat up pretty bad and had to seek medical attention due to the incident.  Upon review of the facts and after talking with his client, Mike realized that the police had not properly investigated the case.  Mike [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Brandt’s client was charged with Assault stemming from a road rage incident.  The other party involved was beat up pretty bad and had to seek medical attention due to the incident.  Upon review of the facts and after talking with his client, Mike realized that the police had not properly investigated the case.  Mike utilized an investigator to interview witnesses to show that his client was not the aggressor and was only acting in self-defense.</p>
<p>  Based upon the independent investigation, the prosecutor agreed to continue the case for dismissal which means that the case was continued out for a period of time, at which time the charge will be dismissed.</p>
<p>  Once the charge is dismissed, Mike’s client will have the ability to have the record expunged (sealed), which will prevent anyone from knowing that he was charged with the offense.</p>
<p>  This result is another example that with thorough preparation and knowledge of the law, Brandt Criminal Defense will use to your advantage to help you through your legal troubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-succeeds-in-getting-assault-charges-continued-for-dismissal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Brandt Wins Implied Consent Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-wins-implied-consent-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-wins-implied-consent-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nnichols@brandtdefense.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Case & Client Victories | Brandt Criminal Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license revocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Brandt recently succeeded in getting the revocation of a client’s driver’s license rescinded based upon an illegal entry by the police into the defendant’s home.   Mike’s client was charged with a DWI and her license was revoked for refusing to test based on an incident where the police officer came to the defendant’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Brandt recently succeeded in getting the revocation of a client’s driver’s license rescinded based upon an illegal entry by the police into the defendant’s home.</p>
<p>  Mike’s client was charged with a DWI and her license was revoked for refusing to test based on an incident where the police officer came to the defendant’s house, spoke with the defendant’s daughter, and then came into the house to arrest the defendant.  Mike argued to the court that the police illegally entered the client’s house and therefore all the evidence from the illegal entry should be suppressed.</p>
<p>  A trial was conducted where the police officer and the defendant’s daughter testified.  Mike made legal arguments to the Judge and the Judge issued a ruling that the police officer illegally entered the house and he rescinded the revocation of the defendant’s driving privileges.  The criminal case was resolved with the client pleading guilty to a charge of Leaving the Scene of an Accident, which had no impact on her driver’s license.</p>
<p>  This case is another example of the thorough preparation, knowledge of the law, and results that come with hiring Brandt Criminal Defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/mike-brandt-wins-implied-consent-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Traffic Violation Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minnesota-traffic-violation-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minnesota-traffic-violation-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scottz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facing license suspension? Unfortunately this is a serious and very annoying punishment for those who have acted recklessly on and off the road. If you are facing a license suspension, it is in your best interest to contact a Minneapolis traffic offense lawyer. You may be able to get your suspension reduced or completely cleared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facing license suspension? Unfortunately this is a serious and very annoying punishment for those who have acted recklessly on and off the road. If you are facing a license suspension, it is in your best interest to contact a Minneapolis traffic offense lawyer. You may be able to get your suspension reduced or completely cleared allowing you to get behind the wheel faster and move on with your life.</p>
<h3>Why Was My License Suspended?</h3>
<p>There are a number of reasons why you could have had your license taken away including the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>DWI offenses &#8211; This is one of the most common reasons for license suspension or license revocation across the state of Minnesota. Minnesota courts are strict when it comes to DUI offenses and, even if you are a first time offender, you could lose your license for a certain period of time. You could also have your license suspended for commercial driver DUI, underage DWI, BWI, AWI, SWI offenses and felony DUI</li>
<li> Test refusal – if you are pulled over and refuse to take any of the DWI tests, you could also lose your license if convicted of a DWI offense.</li>
<li> Criminal vehicular homicide – if you are involved in any CVO or CVH case, then license suspension is most likely the least of your worries. You could also be looking at a felony conviction, jail time and hefty fines.</li>
<li> Traffic offenses – this includes anything from speeding, texting while driving, reckless driving or negligent driving</li>
<li>In some instances, you may face license suspension even if you were not arrested for a DWI or traffic violation including:</li>
<li> Failure to pay child support</li>
<li> Drug charges</li>
<li> Failure to pay fines</li>
<li> Failure to appear for traffic tickets</li>
<li> Out of state convictions</li>
</ul>
<h3>Minneapolis License Suspension Laws</h3>
<p>Your license suspension will depend on the circumstances surrounding your case and the reason for suspension. Below is a guideline to some of the suspensions you could be looking at if facing a DWI conviction:</p>
<ul>
<li> 30 days for first time offenders, in some situations</li>
<li> 90 days for additional DUI offenders</li>
<li> 180 days for drivers under the age of 21</li>
<li> 180 days if the driver has a prior impaired driving incident in the previous ten years</li>
<li> 365 days for test refusal convictions</li>
</ul>
<h3>Facing License Suspension – What Next?</h3>
<p>Keep in mind that, regardless of the level of suspension you are looking at, you only have 30 days to challenge a license suspension which means the sooner you act, the better your chances will be.</p>
<p>Don’t let a traffic violation affect the rest of your life. Protect your rights, your driving record and reputation as well as your personal and professional life. If you or someone you love is facing a criminal conviction, then now is the time to step up and fight back. <strong>Contact Anoka criminal lawyer Michael Brandt at 763-421-6366 for a free, no obligation consultation.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minnesota-traffic-violation-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Brandt Gets Probation Violation Dismissed</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/probation-violation-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/probation-violation-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Case & Client Victories | Brandt Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anoka, MN.  A client recently tested positive for consumption of alcohol in violation of his conditions of probation. The client’s urine tested positive for ethyl glucuronide (EtG) andethyl sulfate (EtS), which are produced by the body during the metabolization of alcohol.  EtG and EtS tests are part of a new wave of forensic urine testing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anoka, MN.  A client recently tested positive for consumption of alcohol in violation of his conditions of probation. The client’s urine tested positive for ethyl glucuronide (EtG) andethyl sulfate (EtS), which are produced by the body during the metabolization of alcohol.  EtG and EtS tests are part of a new wave of forensic urine testing being used by probation agencies, including Anoka County Probation, to monitor alcohol consumption.</p>
<p>During his investigation and research for the case, Mike uncovered several problems with EtG and EtS testing which can cause false positives. This client was exposed to ethanol fumes (one source of false positives) on a daily basis. Based on this research Mike was able to convince the prosecutor that the probation violation charge should be dismissed because the evidence against the client was unreliable and unlikely to be admitted.</p>
<p>When dealing with EtG and EtS tests a thorough investigation is needed to make sure that you are not the victim of a false-positive EtG or EtS test. How much your attorney knows about EtG and EtS testing can make the difference. At Brandt Criminal Defense we have the experience to provide you with your best defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/probation-violation-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kelly Keegan Gets Domestic Assault By Strangulation Charges Dismissed</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/kelly-keegan-gets-domestic-assault-by-strangulation-charges-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/kelly-keegan-gets-domestic-assault-by-strangulation-charges-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Case & Client Victories | Brandt Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Itasca County, 2011. A night on the town for two brothers ended badly when their verbal argument became a physical altercation and someone called the police to report a domestic assault. The Itasca Sheriff’s Office responded to the call and arrested the one of the brothers on the scene. Conducting a thorough investigation, Kelly was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itasca County, 2011. A night on the town for two brothers ended badly when their verbal argument became a physical altercation and someone called the police to report a domestic assault.  The Itasca Sheriff’s Office responded to the call and arrested the one of the brothers on the scene.</p>
<p>Conducting a thorough investigation, Kelly was able to confirm her client’s story and discredit the victim’s allegations with witness interviews. Based on this evidence, and the victim recanting his story, the Itasca County Assistant Attorney agreed to dismiss the case.</p>
<p>Preparation, analysis, research and attention to detail can make or break a client’s defense. At Brandt Criminal Defense we put the time and effort into our client’s cases to obtain positive results for our clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/victories/kelly-keegan-gets-domestic-assault-by-strangulation-charges-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minneapolis Juvenile Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minneapolis-juvenile-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minneapolis-juvenile-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scottz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summer is upon us which means the kids are off school for a couple of months. It also means that many youth are spending more time at the mall, on the streets and in the shops. If your youth has gotten himself or herself in trouble over the school holidays and is facing a juvenile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summer is upon us which means the kids are off school for a couple of months. It also means that many youth are spending more time at the mall, on the streets and in the shops. If your youth has gotten himself or herself in trouble over the school holidays and is facing a juvenile conviction, it is a smart move to contact an experienced Minnesota juvenile lawyer as soon as possible.</p>
<h3>Juvenile Crime Cases</h3>
<p>Juvenile crimes are classified as any crime committed by someone under the age of 18. Most juvenile crimes are misdemeanor offenses and may include:</p>
<ul>
<li> Petty theft – any theft under $500 is considered petty theft</li>
<li> Petty offenses – these are offenses that are not considered crimes for those over the age of 21 but are if younger, such as smoking and disobeying curfew</li>
<li> Shoplifting – most shoplifting crimes are committed by those under the age of 18</li>
<li> Employee theft – employee theft can happen at any age and includes instances of stealing office supplies, voiding receipts to pocket the money, stealing from the cash register, taking stock without paying for it and switching price tags</li>
<li> Traffic violations – including texting while driving, speeding and reckless driving</li>
<li> Open bottle law – having alcohol in a public place</li>
<li> Disturbing the peace – throwing loud parties, loitering, fighting and any other boisterous behavior is considered an offense</li>
</ul>
<h3>Facing a juvenile charge? What is at stake?</h3>
<p>A juvenile conviction may not seem like that big of a deal but it can haunt your record and your future forever. Even if you avoid jail time, you could still be looking at electronic monitoring, house arrest, counseling, driving training, fines and community service. You could also be looking at a black mark on your driving record as well as your criminal record. This can (and in most instances, will), be accessed by potential colleges, landlords and employees making it hard to move on with your life past this conviction.</p>
<p>If you have been arrested for a juvenile crime, then your punishment will not only depend on the circumstances surrounding your case, but also at the evidence, where the crime was committed and who is overseeing the case. In an effort to rehabilitate the youth, Minnesota judges tend to be strict when it comes to juvenile cases. Your best defense against any juvenile arrest, regardless of how petty it may seem, is an experienced Minneapolis juvenile lawyer.</p>
<p>Don’t let a juvenile charge affect the rest of your life. Protect your rights and your reputation as well as your future. If you or someone you love is facing a criminal conviction, then now is the time to step up and fight back. <strong>Contact Anoka criminal lawyer Michael Brandt at 763-421-6366 for a free, no obligation consultation.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minneapolis-juvenile-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Defense Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-defense-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-defense-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scottz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandtdefense.com/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you been arrested of a DUI? Is this your first offense? Are you unsure whether to hire a lawyer, to accept the consequences or to try and defend yourself? When it comes to first degree DUI offenses, it may seem like a waste of time and money to hire a Minnesota DWI attorney. After [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you been arrested of a DUI? Is this your first offense? Are you unsure whether to hire a lawyer, to accept the consequences or to try and defend yourself? When it comes to first degree DUI offenses, it may seem like a waste of time and money to hire a Minnesota DWI attorney. After all, this was just a one-off thing right? The judge will know this and let you off with a warning, right? Unfortunately, this is most likely not the case</p>
<h3>Do I Need a Minnesota DWI Attorney?</h3>
<p>There is a good chance that, if this is your first offense, you will not go to jail, unless you are convicted of a series gross misdemeanor or felony offense. However, there is still a lot at stake including license suspension and fines. Even first time offenders can lose their license for anywhere from 30 to 365 days. In some instances you may be issued ‘whisky plates’. Either way, this can negatively impact your personal and professional life. Most of us rely on our cars to get to work, to get errands done and to get around town. It can be embarrassing and frustrating having to whisk the kids off to school in a vehicle with ‘whisky plates’ or having to rely on your colleague to drive you to and from work for three months.</p>
<p>Even one minor DWI offense will go on both your driving record and your criminal record. You can kiss low cost insurance rates goodbye and you may also have a hard time finding decent employment, housing and financial assistance in the future. After all, landlords, employers and lending companies often include a background check as part of the application process.</p>
<h3>Repeat Offenders and Advice</h3>
<p>Repeat offenders will need a Minnesota DUI lawyer. As every subsequent DWI arrest is made more severe, you will want to lower your risk of conviction as best as possible. In general, the better defense you have, the better outcome you will be granted. Keep in mind that three repeat DUI charges is considered a felony offense – this is something all Minnesota drivers will want to avoid.</p>
<h3>The Bottom Line of Minnesota DUI Arrests…</h3>
<p>If you have been arrested for a DWI offense, regardless of if this is your first or fifth offense, a phone call to a Minneapolis DWI lawyer can make all the difference in the world. Look for an experienced Minnesota DWI attorney that provides 24/7 service as well as a free initial consultation. Keep in mind that, in all Minnesota counties, you only have 30 days to contest a DUI arrest which means the sooner you act, the better your chances will be.<br />
Don’t let DUI charge affect the rest of your life. Protect your rights, your driving record and reputation as well as your personal and professional life. If you or someone you love is facing a criminal conviction, then now is the time to step up and fight back. <strong>Contact Anoka criminal lawyer Michael Brandt at 763-421-6366 for a free, no obligation consultation.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandtdefense.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-defense-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

